If you read the feminist blogsophere, you're already aware of the most recent controversy over appropriation, writing, citing, publication, and racism. I haven't known what to say about it that hasn't already been said better by other bloggers, so I haven't said anything. Which, I have realized, is totally wrong, because my silence on the issue as a white feminist winds up coming off like complicity, like I don't think the issues are important, like I support the status quo, and none of that is true.
So, just for the record, I basically agree with
the position expressed and explained here. There are tons of links there if you want to go clicking around to get more background on what's sparking me to make this post, but out of respect for one of the women who has quit blogging and quit feminism over this, I'm leaving names out of this post and just trying to speak to the relevant structural issues in a more general way.
I'm still learning how to be a more effective anti-racist ally, but this particular conflict -- along with the larger pattern of racist behavior among prominent white feminist bloggers that it is a part of -- has gone a long way toward instructing me in how
not to behave. To a certain extent, I understand the defensive reaction white people tend to have whenever we are told we are exhibiting racist behavior. I've had that defensive reaction myself. I can definitely relate to how it feels to be told that you're doing something that you genuinely don't believe you're doing and that you find viscerally repulsive.
However, with nearly 40 years of womanhood and nearly 30 years of feminism behind me, I'm also pretty damn clear about just how many men there are out there who do not see all of the sexist patterns in the social organization that function to oppress women in countless different ways. It's like the death of a thousand paper cuts. It's
everywhere. And men not seeing it is frustrating, but often understandable. What's not even a little bit okay is whenever there's a roomful of women telling men, "Yes, that is straight-up sexist, and here's why," and the men ignore the explanations, dismiss the criticisms, accuse the critics of being hateful, and/or defend the behavior, sometimes all of the above. "Blah blah blah, you're being oversensitive or you must just have an
agenda, because you certainly seem very angry and
we don't see any sexism here at all, so if you want our help you're going to have be a lot more reasonable." omg, giant assholes.
So it ought not be such a big leap for any white feminist to figure out that one of the foundational requirements involved in being even a halfway decent anti-racist ally is that you have to accept that people of color in general absolutely know how to spot racist patterns in the cultural structure better than white people do. And that whenever people of color whose voices you generally respect speak up and tell you that you have done something wrong, chances are extremely high that you did, in fact, do something wrong. You will never learn what you did wrong, and thus you will keep doing it and keep hurting people, unless and until you engage the discussion and make a concentrated effort to see a perspective on the world that is not your own. A refusal to do so perpetuates racism, and a hostile refusal to do so pours salt in an open wound.
For white feminists, this move should come a lot easier than it does, because we are organized in the first place to correct the various structural power imbalances that privilege men in society, and making a concentrated effort to see a perspective on the world that is not their own is the exact same thing that we are constantly demanding of men. We want them to learn to be our allies, to trust that our perspectives about sexism are generally more valid than theirs because we're the targets of it and it's easier for us to see what hurts us than it is for them to see where they get privileges; if they claim to be allies then we expect them to not be defensive jerks and to
listen for long enough to understand where and how they are participating in sexist social patterns that hurt women. We legitimately expect them to listen, to learn, and to change.
White feminists owe this same behavior to people of color on feminist principles just as much as on anti-racist ally principles. We cannot do effective equality work without recognizing that sex-based discrimination is not the only structural factor that oppresses women -- indeed, for many women, it's not even the most powerfully oppressive category, which I understand all too well as a genderqueer/queer type person (and which is one reason why I am not a radical feminist*). Feminism simply isn't a functional women's equality movement unless it acknowledges and seeks to eradicate all of the power imbalances that affect all women, which means that feminists must necessarily also be anti-racist allies (among other things), and that we must press the movement as a whole to work for
all women equally.
________________
*I don't really do qualifier feminism. Ideologically, I'm probably most closely aligned with the weirdo theory-head anti-hierarchy postmodern/post-structuralist anarchist feminists. My particular brand of feminism is like a pastiche of multiple kinds of feminisms; it changes and grows over time and experience; it makes alliances with any movement it can find that furthers equality; and it keeps its allegiance tied directly to the concept of equality.
Labels: feminism, race