Thursday, March 29, 2007

For Them

Negotiating an understanding of my own queer gender has been much more difficult for me than negotiating an understanding of my own queer sexuality. Sexuality is easy, conceptually. We all know what sexuality is, for the most part, and there is a goodly amount of shared understanding about it in the culture. The concept of gender is far more complicated. Honestly, I'm still not very good at talking about it from a personal standpoint. I do the theory better.

A lot of people have a lot of rigid ideas about gender that boil down to nothing more than arbitrary bullshit, but they are alarmingly resistant to letting them the fuck go, and gender is connected to people's core sense of their identities so when this stuff slips into an argumentative space it tends to heat up very quickly. Gender transgressions are still pretty damn deadly, so I am very careful about that space. I think for a lot of genderqueer people, there is a background track that runs through your head underneath everything else: "How much of myself can I be here and not get killed?" Depending on one's gender presentation and one's physical sex, the question is often modified: "How much of myself can I be here and not get raped and/or killed?"

Anyone who's genderqueer to a degree sufficient to force self-examination over it knows that you can break gender into a lot of pieces for analysis, but that the two that seem to come up most often are the one about how a person identifies their own gender inside of themselves on a emotional/psychological level, and the one about how the culture perceives one's gendered body and thus how others tend to treat the person.

To this point, whenever I've posted pictures of myself as a child on this blog and elsewhere on the net, I've posted pictures that were taken when I was with my mother, who was very strict about my appearance adhering to gender norms. My gendered behavior was let to slide whenever it was convenient for her, or too inconvenient to argue the point with me, so as you might imagine I influenced those contexts as often as possible in my quest to control my own non-traditional identity expressions. As soon as I was out of my mother's reach, even as a very small child, there was a drastic change in my appearance. Here I am, about age 7, on a trip to Key West without my mother's supervision:




It's not that I wanted to be a boy. It's just that I wasn't comfortable being categorized as a girl either. Neither category seemed to fit me. I couldn't look at the entire breadth of the cultural implications of either label and go, "Yeah, that one's close enough." I could not just pick, because the choices being presented to me were only two, and neither was right, and at the same time, there was a huge amount of pressure to pick the choice that lined up with my genitals. With all that cultural pressure, a vulva, a name like Jennifer and a mother who fought me hard on plenty of gender norm deviations, it was a difficult feat to even attempt to stake out a territory somewhere in the mushy middle of it all, where I could mix and switch at will, and was the only place that felt even remotely comfortable to me.

This "dressing like a boy" thing wasn't about being a boy, for me. My identity, even at that green of an age, was already firmly set in some kind of "neither/both, none of the above, all of the above" manner regarding gender. And my behavior didn't change a whit depending on how I was dressed, but when you couple it with the change in appearance, you can start to imagine how differently I must have been treated:




A kid who "looks like a boy" doing this is treated like a little man, like a future Cool Guy, whereas a kid who "looks like a girl" doing this attracts an entirely different sort and form of attention. It is generally negative attention even when it masquerades as positive, by which I mean, it's commonly focused around reminding the girl that boys won't like her if she "acts like a boy", but even when the adults are trying to be nice about it and say things like, "Wow, you shoot really good for a girl!", that's some highly offensive shit going on right there. The culture is so thoroughly saturated with toxicity about sex and gender, it is hard to escape it. I figured out pretty early on that people being confused by my gender was often going to be as good as things got.

My mother refused to let me have my gender. She wouldn't let me cut my hair short (which I did without her permission, several times, even though I knew I'd get in huge trouble every time), and she laid an endless series of very heavy gender conformity trips on me about "looking and acting like a girl". She constantly sabotaged or ignored my sports career, which was tremendously important to me as a kid -- and I was good, too; I won spots on all-select soccer teams that had sponsors to pay for us to tour Europe, and my mother wouldn't let me go because she thought it made me "too much of a jock". She was not above using frequent violence and verbal abuse to force me to conform to her gender expectations.

So when I watched this week's episode of FX's new show, The Riches, which includes a genderqueer child as a character*, I totally fucking cried at this one scene where Minnie Driver, who plays the kid's mom, is trying to scam the kids into a private school and winds up telling the genderqueer kid -- who is very blended in displaying both masculine and feminine signifiers -- that the kid is going to have to pick.

The kid's face falls to sad and a little helpless when she says it. And she hastily adds, "Oh no, not for me. You don't have to pick for me. Never for me. For them."

omg, if my mother had ever said anything like that to me I think I'd have exploded from the joy. My genderqueer experience has been so similar in certain ways to the way they're playing this kid's experience. The mixing, the overlap, the blending, the both/and, the neither/nor, all of that, that's me, that's for me. The adherence to what doesn't represent me, the disconnection, the repression, the coverups, the pretending, all of that, that's for them. Goddamn, I still can't even really imagine having a parent love me and accept me anyway, but it's amazing to watch.

The show itself is about stealing The American Dream. Part of the kid's dream, of course, is to have an authentic self that includes the expression of femininity. Cast as the kid's father is genderqueer performer Eddie Izzard, who says in that Advocate article that I linked that he's playing his character almost like a version of his own father when it comes to dealing with the genderqueer kid, which is difficult to watch but the whole thing is compelling as all hell to me.

Even setting all the genderqueer stuff aside, this show has a lot going for it with a great cast, very good writing (so far), and a really fun concept. It looks to be a fun show on a lot of levels, many of them about identity in various ways, and since identity is one of my pet theory things, I look forward to watching them explore and expand on all of them. Highly recommended.

__________

*hat tip to the always lovely Freakgirl for the link to Advocate article.

Labels: , ,

14 Comments:

At 3/29/2007 12:50 PM, Blogger freakgirl said...

That scene with Minnie Driver really touched me, as well. I meant to mention it to you yesterday, but I see you found it on your own. :)

 
At 3/29/2007 1:14 PM, Blogger Jen said...

I think the idea that the family is constructed as travelers really works for scenes like that one. The parents only have to be overly concerned with "buffer norms" to the extent that they make a con work, and built in to that, built in to their family identity, is this sense of "true secret identity" that they keep to themselves. So it's understood that "who they really are" is different from whichever identity they're portraying to run cons in "buffer world".

Obviously they've written Izzard's character Wayne to have more of an issue with young Sam's genderqueer identity, and it will be interesting to see them explore that in the background as a feature of masculinity, and/or as having arisen from Wayne's "half-breed" background as both buffer & traveler, etc.

But yeah, I wanted to hug Minnie Driver just for delivering the line so damn convincingly. :)

 
At 3/29/2007 3:14 PM, Blogger Michael said...

I have to see this show.

Even though (because?) you seem happy in it, that first picture of you made me cry a little.

There's a picture of me that can still do that to me. I'm about five and standing in the backyard of this little old house we lived in. I look happy enough in it, but the act had around begun. Even though I was only five or so, I can distinctly remember my Mom saying "Stand like a boy!" right before she took it. Now, believe me, she is the loveliest and sweetest woman you'd ever want to meet. She just did what she could with what she knew, I guess.

 
At 3/29/2007 3:32 PM, Blogger Jen said...

The mental image of you at 5 and kinda swishy is only the cutest thing in the history of ever. I'm so sorry they didn't understand you. I hope you'll show me that picture someday.

 
At 3/29/2007 6:08 PM, Blogger AndiF said...

I'm glad you wrote about this show for selfish reasons -- I don't watch much television but I meant to watch this and forgot about it.

I spent a significant portion of my childhood being told that I must act like a lady and that girls don't do that with "that" being everything I liked doing and things that girls did being everything I couldn't stand. Of course, growing up in the 50s, the gendered behaviors were a lot more prescribed and violating gender norms was as easy as falling off a log (girls don't climb on logs!).

I still have a really visceral hate for the word lady.

 
At 3/29/2007 6:59 PM, Blogger Jen said...

I'm reasonably sure I wouldn't have survived the 50s.

Let me know what you think of the show whenever you get around to watching it. I imagine FX will run a catchup block soon since it's been getting good reviews.

 
At 3/29/2007 8:08 PM, Blogger Michael said...

Jen, I'd have to lift it from my Mom, but I'll say that even after that command, my hip is kinda jutted out. Otherwise, I'm a terribly skinny white-haired kid in jeans and t.

I'm gonna go watch the show now.

We said it before, but you were just a terribly beautiful child.

 
At 3/29/2007 8:48 PM, Blogger Jen said...

Your description reminds me of the cover of a Kevin Sessums book.

And thank you.

 
At 3/29/2007 9:42 PM, Blogger freakgirl said...

My cousin's son, who is around 3 years old or so, has, over the past few months, begun expressing interest in things like carrying a pocketbook, wearing makeup and asking for a "princess party" for his birthday.

My uncle has referred to the boy as a "fairy." Shitty. My cousin (the boy's dad) is slightly weirded out. My cousin's wife, in her own words to me - "I don't give a shit what he does. I let him play with my makeup. It makes him happy. Just because he enjoys this stuff doesn't make him anything. He's just a little kid."

She also is giving him his princess party but will be calling it a castle party - reminded me of the Minnie Driver thing - "for them."

 
At 3/29/2007 11:40 PM, Blogger Jen said...

The flip side of this "for them" business, of course, is the damage it does to a person who's being told, however lovingly, that who they are is inappropriate for public display. We are very young when that starts having an effect.

Still, I'd guess a secret princess party is better than no princess party at all. :)

 
At 3/30/2007 12:53 AM, Blogger Marjon said...

For me it was the opposite. I think my mom could've related to your story on so many levels. She hated skirts, wanted to wear pants and be a carpenter when she grew up. She couldn't because her dad told her that girls don't do that.
When I grew up she always made sure that it was okay to wear pants and I could become whatever I wanted to and all that. But because she hated all the girly stuff so much, she never taught or told me about them. And she hated them. So I almost never wore skirts or make up around her and I cut my hair short.
When I left the house to live with fellow students, I started to explore the more girly-side of me. But still with somewhat of a guilty feeling. And I still prefer pants.
I know I am not gay, but I am "manly" or react "manly" to things. And I am not sure if my not being a girly-girl is because I'm just not or because I am so used to pleasing my mother that it became normal for me. And the pleasing my mom-part is so unnecessary, because she died 13 years ago.

 
At 3/30/2007 8:10 AM, Blogger Jen said...

Marjon, I agree that sometimes it's really hard to tell which parts of gender are "authentic" to the extent that we'd have them no matter what our circumstances were, and which parts might have only developed or been emphasized as a response to our particular social and familial contexts. And an awful lot of this stuff is affected by the way that all kids pretty much try to be who their parents want them to be, or try to avoid being someone their parents won't like, things like that.

I've never been sure how much parental approval, or seeking their love or whatever, might be able to affect who we actually become, or just how we feel about who we become. Sometimes that almost feels like the same thing.

 
At 3/30/2007 8:29 AM, Blogger freakgirl said...

Jen, sadly, I'd rather he just has the castle party, because otherwise he'll hear his grandfather calling him a fairy, which is probably even more damaging. Sigh.

 
At 3/30/2007 9:31 AM, Blogger Jen said...

Yeah, that's what I mean. It's like being caught between a rock and a hard place -- you always want a child to be able to express themselves and their identities honestly, because you know that's what's healthy, but the world can be a harsh place and you also have to teach them which environments are unsafe for which expressions. There is no easy answer there, it is all very difficult, and especially so when the child is still so young and vulnerable, and when the shaming is coming from within the family.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home